Meeting:

County letter would ask Interior to drop full-length Moose-Wilson pathway

Teton County commissioners will consider a letter Monday asking Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to reconsider the Park Service's August mandate for a separated pathway along the whole Moose-Wilson corridor, citing wildlife disturbance and habitat fragmentation.

The Moose-Wilson corridor, the wetland-laced strip of Grand Teton National Park between Moose and the Granite Canyon entrance, would get a separated multiuse pathway along its full length under a National Park Service amendment dated August 14, 2026. On Monday, the Teton County Board of County Commissioners will consider a draft letter to Interior Secretary Doug Burgum. The letter says: "We ask the Department to reconsider the corridor-length pathway decision" (draft letter). It also asks the department to meet with the board before further implementation. The letter notes that the amendment itself acknowledges the 2016 analysis found "increased wildlife disturbance, habitat loss, and fragmentation from a second human-use corridor," along with harm to vegetation, historic character and archeological sites (draft letter). The Park Service says it reopened the decision to follow Executive Order 14314 on recreational access. The county's position is that its proposed mitigation does not resolve the problem.

The letter attaches the board's January 2016 comments, written when the county was a cooperating agency on the original plan. Those comments stated that "we do not support a separate pathway along the entire corridor" (2016 comment letter). Instead, commissioners proposed traffic calming and short, 5-foot uphill bicycle climbing lanes hugging the road. Their reasoning was that such lanes would "minimize habitat fragmentation, reduce the likelihood of surprising a bear" (2016 comment letter). The county database shows no other action on this item. The 2016 argument about bears and slow uphill speeds still applies, and nothing in the amendment, as the letter summarizes it, shows it was tested.

Background

Moose-Wilson Corridor Pathway Requirement

The Board asked the Department of the Interior to reconsider its 2026 mandate for a full separated pathway along the Moose-Wilson corridor, citing cost, environmental, planning, and community alignment concerns.

Latest: 2026-09 — Board of County Commissioners requested reconsideration of the separated pathway requirement, citing planning, cost, and environmental concerns.

curated as of 2026-09-27

Teton County Multiuse Pathway Decision

In 2026, Teton County opposed the addition of a separated multiuse pathway to the Moose-Wilson Corridor plan, requested reconsideration, and formally sought cooperating agency status to influence federal planning.

Latest: 2026-10-05 — Teton County formally requested inclusion as a cooperating agency in the federal planning process for the Moose-Wilson Corridor.

curated as of 2026-10-04

National Elk Refuge Bison and Elk Management Plan Draft Environmental Impact Statement

Teton County's Board opposed a corridor-length pathway in the National Elk Refuge Bison and Elk Management Plan DEIS, citing wildlife and process concerns, and called for alternatives and better local engagement (2025–2026).

Latest: 2026-07-07 — Board reiterated its DEIS concerns and recommendations in a formal objection letter regarding the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and draft Record of Decision, referencing the original June 2025 comments.

curated as of 2026-10-10

Source Documents

DateTitleType
September 28, 2026BCC Correspondence — Moose Wilson Corridor Comprehensive Management Plan Record of Decision Amendment Draft Lettercorrespondence